Lesson Learned From The Covid-19 Pandemic: Employee Empowerment As A Key In Service Businesses
Lesson learned from the Covid-19 pandemic: Employee empowerment as a key in service businesses
“We believe that if we treat our employees right, they will treat our customers right, and in turn that results in increased business and profits that make everyone happy,” – Southwest Airlines.
In Indonesia, 2 March 2020 denoted the ‘official’ date for the first case of Covid-19. The Covid-19 pandemic stood an immense challenge for the Indonesian government and citizens. Particularly for business sectors, the data from Statistics Indonesia (BPS) in 2020 showed that more than 90% of service businesses earned less and more than 85% mentioned that business demands decreased during the pandemic.
Furthermore, service workers were among those severely impacted by the challenges of working during the pandemic. During the Covid-19 pandemic, they have to juggle numerous thoughts about working. Like the uncertainty of the company’s existence in the future, the risk of being infected by Covid-19 if they persist in working at the office, the menace of mental health upon prolonged work from home (WFH), and the demands to keep delivering professional services as if the Covid-19 pandemic is not a thing.
At the end of 2020, I conducted studies on service workers in Indonesia. My colleagues and I focus on whether or not the pandemic influence Indonesian service workers’ emotions and well-being. If it does negatively affect the workers, what company’s policy might help?
Our empirical study revealed several findings, among them are 1) hardly surprising, the pandemic indeed affects the emotional state of the service workers, 2) the pandemic makes service workers tend to perform fake emotions at work, and 3) employee empowerment might be one of the ways to minimize the risk of emotional adversity for Indonesian service workers during the pandemic.
I would like to focus on the third finding, that employee empowerment policy helped cope with the crisis. Empowerment involves a huge sense of trust where the employee may work independently on behalf of the company’s name. Empowerment may turn into ‘a big gamble’ in service businesses where a company’s whole reputation lies on the delivered services
Nevertheless, the Covid-19 situation, by nature, forced the companies to gamble. Especially for the companies that applied the WFH policy, it seems there were no other options but to trust the employee. During the WFH period, there will be no or minimal supervision and a restricted mechanism to ensure the workers follow the Standard Operationalized Procedures (SOP). Henceforth, the best bet a company could make was to empower their employees and hope they could manage the work independently.
However, that peculiar situation forcing companies to empower the workers could be a blessing in disguise. Slightly before the pandemic spread worldwide, a research report from Harvard Business Review (HBR) in early 2020 suggested that empowering frontline workers to make important decision boosts all aspects of business results: increased satisfaction of customers and employees, better service quality, and improved business efficiency.
In early 2021, an article from Forbes suggested that empowerment amidst Covid-19 means being less ‘corporate’ and enhancing more humanist approaches like empathy and open communication. In the mid of 2020, an article from Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) emphasizes that among the keys to enabling employee empowerment are to let go of the detail and focus on outcomes
Long ago, in a seminal paper about employee empowerment for service businesses, Lashley (1999) suggested that empowerment is not only about the trust-oriented culture and high discretion to perform tasks. Lashley stated that empowerment involves five dimensions. Along with the two earlier mentioned dimensions (culture and task), task allocation, power, and commitment characterize employee empowerment.
The task allocation for the empowered employee should characterize responsible autonomy. The company should first decide the border of do’s and don’ts, what employees can and cannot do to satisfy the customers. For instance, can employees offer discounts on their own? Can they offer further technical assistance beyond the SOP to calm angry customers? And so on
The power dimension hints that being empowered does not mean the employees can deny the objectives set upon them. Managers should strongly affirm that empowered employees have a high degree of power to construct how they perform. However, the targets from the company should be treated as a given condition. Many misconceptions on this part make the practice of empowerment backlash the overall positive aims both for the company and the employee. The key is a clear ‘rule of the game’ from the beginning.
Last but not least, empowerment should enhance moral commitment among employees. Managers may explain the ‘gambling’ company did by giving more freedom to the employees. Make them understand that they better reciprocate the trust company gave to them with moral commitment.
My other recently published study also conveyed an important point on this matter. Employee empowerment will only be effective if the employees are satisfied with their job and committed to the organization. If these two conditions are not fulfilled, the outcome of employee empowerment may harm the business
The takeaway from the Covid-19 pandemic concerning empowerment policy is no longer to ask whether or not we should empower our employees. Nor to ask whether or not we trust our employees enough to give them the freedom to act. Now, it is time to ask how we best empower our employees
In any way empowerment is designed, remember the message from the opening quote of this article that empowerment should focus on making employees happy as happy employees generate a profitable company.
Share this :
is a lecturer and researcher at the Department of Management, Faculty of Business and Economics, Universitas Islam Indonesia (UII), Yogyakarta. His primary expertise is in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management subjects.
Gagasan Lainnya
Tips Berkomunikasi Efektif dengan Dosen:
Norma perilaku mahasiswa saat menghubungi dosen dan staf adalah pedoman berkomunikasi yang mengutamakan kesopanan, penggunaan bahasa formal, pengenalan diri yang jelas, komunikasi pada jam kerja, penyampaian tujuan dengan ringkas, dan penantian balasan dengan sabar. Mahasiswa juga diharapkan untuk selalu menutup komunikasi dengan ucapan terima kasih, mencerminkan rasa hormat dan profesionalisme dalam lingkungan akademik.
Mengelola Atasan: Seni Membangun Hubungan Kerja yang Efektif
Pada Tahun 1980, ada artikel menarik yang ditulis dua Profesor Manajemen dari Harvard yang diberi judul “Managing your boss”. Artikel ini lalu dimuat ulang di Harvard Business Review Edisi Spring 2016. Di Harvard Business Review, sudah lazim artikel tententu yang membahas isu penting yang dianggap relevan dimuat ulang pada edisi berbeda, beberapa tahun atau bahkan dekade setelahnya. Lalu apa isi dari artikel yang ditulis oleh Dua Profesor tersebut?
Asal-Usul Kapitalisme: Eropa, China, dan Arab
Arab Islam sebagai kapitalisme religius atau kapitalisme perdagangan jelas berbeda. Kedua jenis kapitalisme tersebut ditemukan jauh sebelum kapitalisme (industri) di Eropa. Kapitalisme perdagangan amat bisa jadi lebih dekat karakteristiknya dengan kapitalisme industri.